The Operation
Extraliminal time travel begins when attention loosens its fixation on the local present. The body remains in its ordinary place. Consciousness reads configurations that the usual sequence keeps apart. Information and orientation return to the practitioner. That return changes the practitioner’s relation to the next moment.
The operation joins the temporal field with the documented lineage of Remote Viewing. Extraliminal means beyond the threshold of ordinary perception. The nervous system supplies the instrument. Breath, posture, sound, attention, and disciplined imagery change the range of experience it receives. Training concerns that instrument before any proposed machine.
Precognition receives information about future configurations; retrocognition receives information about past ones. Other modes disclose both together, branching probabilities, or the timeless awareness described in Tibetan bardo literature. Information arrives without the ordinary sequence that would explain its arrival. Access therefore requires discrimination. A vivid image can carry a signal, projection, memory, or attractor drawing the practitioner toward a possible outcome.
The practitioner must prepare the vessel and distinguish a field impression from imagination. Returning with information that can be tested gives the encounter another consequence. The Practice supplies the wider discipline. Psi and the Higher Self develops its relation to agency and the higher-order intelligence that answers the practitioner.
How Nonlinear Access Fits the Time Model
Consciousness is primary. Sequential time samples a field whose relations exceed the order in which events appear. Relativity’s four-dimensional manifold supplies a technical analogy. Bohm’s implicate order supplies a metaphysical one. Manifest events unfold from a deeper pattern in which their relations remain enfolded.
Attention changes the vessel when it stops spending its entire capacity on the immediate surface. Contemplative lineages developed that change through disciplined practice. Twentieth-century programs used audio entrainment, altered-state protocols, and statistical testing. Memory, anticipation, and present perception begin to exchange information across their usual boundaries. The methods retain their different conditions and measures.
Bentov proposed that breath, circulation, and micromechanical rhythm organize the body into a more coherent oscillatory state. His specific planetary coupling remains a hypothesis. Posture, breath, sound, and attention alter temporal experience and the quality of imagery. Those changes can be examined before assigning them a planetary mechanism. The Human Instrument carries the body-side question; The Temporal Field carries the larger ontology.
The Vocabulary
Traditions investigating the field developed terms for distinct temporal operations. Ordinary English gathers them under time. That contraction conceals differences the practitioner must learn to recognize.
The Greek chronos names sequential, measurable duration. Clocks, biographical age, and ordinary consensus experience occupy this sequence. Kairos names the qualitative right moment, when a particular operation becomes possible. The arrow finds the open gate. Aion names the unbounded standing eternity within which sequence and opportunity occur. It gives both their field.
Early Christian Greek preserved these distinctions. In the Eastern liturgy, the deacon exclaims Kairos tou poiēsai tō Kyriō. The liturgical moment joins sequential duration to the unbounded present. The rite establishes a crossing that one undifferentiated word obscures. Naming the distinction makes it available to attention.
Sufi waqt names the present moment in its qualitative density. Through muraqaba, vigilant presence, the practitioner returns to that moment. The mature Sufi is ibn al-waqt, son of the moment, born new in each waqt. Dahr names the eternal duration that contains these moments.
Ibn ʿArabi described God as dahr, a single day without nighttime or daytime. Divine names and attributes divide that day into many days. Mir Damad developed huduth dahri, origination in eternal duration. His zaman measures changing events, while dahr relates their world to immutable archetypes. Sarmad names the eternal relation of divine essence and attributes. These levels relate creation to eternity without placing eternity earlier in a temporal sequence.
The Vedic kala names ordinary cyclic time. Mahakala names the great time within which cyclic returns occur. Yuga literature describes epochs as configurations of consciousness. A duration along one axis cannot express the change of condition between those ages.
Hebrew zeman names sequential time; olam names the world-age or unbounded extension within which that sequence runs. Christian patristic thought added aevum, the duration proper to angelic intelligences. Angels participate in sequence and eternity without occupying either mode exclusively. Aquinas elaborated the category for beings whose temporal access exceeds the human one.
Mircea Eliade brought a related distinction into comparative religion through illud tempus, “that time.” The primordial moment gives subsequent ritual its efficacy. A properly performed rite establishes conditions through which the practitioner stands inside that moment. The original event becomes a present configuration of the field. Commemoration alone would leave the practitioner at a sequential distance. Ritual actualizes the originating time at the scale of a culture.
The Initiatic Traditions
Initiatic lineages carried technical knowledge of this operation through the cataclysm cycle. Their methods configure the practitioner for access and teach how to govern its results.
Patañjali’s Yoga Sutras catalog siddhis, capacities arising through sustained samyama, integrated concentration, meditation, and absorption. One is atīta-anāgata-jñāna, knowledge of past and future. It follows samyama on the threefold transformation. The text presents the capacity as an outcome of practice. Subsequent manuals elaborate the conditions through which it stabilizes.
The commentarial tradition places these powers within advanced practice. A changed vessel acquires another range of functioning. The warning concerns mistaking that range for the goal. Pursuing a power can interrupt the development that made it available. Access belongs within a larger transformation of being.
Shamanic traditions describe journeys and time-walking. The Siberian shaman calls the drum a horse on which the practitioner rides. Its rhythm opens the configuration for the journey. Ethnographic accounts include visits to past events to recover lost soul-fragments. Other journeys enter future events to read the community’s trajectory.
Australian Aboriginal Dreamtime carries an originating temporal mode. Pitjantjatjara tjukurpa names the ancestral world-shaping acts and their continuing availability. Ceremony gives the present practitioner access to that origin. Past and present remain nested within the same field. The rite places the practitioner inside the originating moment.
Sufi muraqaba develops vigilant presence. Dhikr, disciplined repetition, suspends the discursive mind and opens the present moment onto eternal duration. Ibn ʿArabi’s Futūhāt al-Makkiyya describes trained perception of al-dahr as one configuration in which all moments coexist. The Quranic prophets’ capacity follows their access to that configuration. Prophecy receives temporal information through an actual spiritual operation.
Christian tradition preserves access through prophecy, vision, and theoria, contemplative perception. John’s Apocalypse records the entry into such an operation:
I was in the spirit on the Lord’s day, and heard behind me a great voice, as of a trumpet.
John receives future events from outside their sequential frame. The Hesychast tradition of Mount Athos developed the Jesus Prayer as a discipline for entering contemplative perception. The Philokalia describes conditions for reliable spiritual perception. A visionary’s entry requires preparation and judgment as well as receptivity.
The Iranian Islamic current recovered by Corbin supplies another precise vocabulary. Its mundus imaginalis, or ʿālam al-mithāl, is an intermediate world with actual being. It occupies a relation between sensory and conceptual experience. Prophetic events have ontological status there. The consensus receives one temporal expression of that world among several.
Greek oracles operated within institutions. Delphi’s Pythia, Cumae’s Sibyl, and Dodona’s priestesses served people seeking knowledge of the temporal field. Environmental and pharmacological conditions shaped their practice. Accounts associate Delphi with pneuma rising from a chasm and Cumae with the geometric stillness of the Sibyl’s cave.
Mediterranean rulers consulted these institutions before military and dynastic decisions for nearly a millennium. Continued patronage depended on consequences that mattered materially to those rulers. That economy shows how seriously they treated the capacity. Belief and use remain distinct from a modern measurement of every oracle’s accuracy. The institution gave temporal perception a political body.
The Contemplative Phenomenology
Twentieth-century contemplative laboratories produced descriptions detailed enough for comparison between practitioners. Monroe developed a Focus-level taxonomy through three decades of out-of-body cartography at the Monroe Institute. Each level names a configuration of perception along the extraliminal range.
Focus 12 extends perception beyond ordinary sensory access. Focus 15 is Monroe’s no time. Past, present, and future lose their sequential ordering. Time’s contents appear as locations between which consciousness moves. Practitioners reaching Focus 15 through the Gateway Process report this spatial quality.
The autobiographical past becomes a landscape that the practitioner walks. Future configurations become accessible terrain. Consciousness stops riding the stream and surveys the basin. The experience changes the perceiver’s position in relation to temporal content.
Focus 21 bridges into nonphysical reality systems. Focus 27, the Park, receives recently dead consciousness. Focus 34–35, the Gathering, contains vast assemblages of consciousness at a moment Monroe’s practitioners identified as transitional. These configurations give death and collective transition places within the map.
Focus 42 names I-There cluster consciousness. Focus 49 opens onto a sea of I-There clusters. An I-There gathers personalities and experience across a consciousness’s lifetimes. The practitioner encounters that gathering directly. Past lives cease to arrive solely as memories carried forward by the current self. Their simultaneous availability supplies the distinctive operation.
Focus 49 enlarges the encounter from one cluster to a wider association of clusters. The Monroe Institute’s Starlines program names that reach the Infinite Sea. Bohm’s implicate order supplies an analogy through the enfolding of events that appear separately in the manifest world.
Tibetan monastic practice developed a parallel account across more than a millennium. The bardo literature describes transitions between stable frames of experience. In the bardo of dharmata, sequential time dissolves and consciousness perceives the field directly. The Bardo Thodol addresses a dying person through an instruction for recognition:
Recognize this Clear Light as the nature of your own mind, the text instructs, and liberation is instantaneous.
Recognition ends the constraint through which the ordinary sequence governed perception. A trained attendant reads the instructions to a dying or recently dead person. The attendant assists the person’s recognition. The tradition teaches that skill, specifies conditions for its stabilization, and trains practitioners across decades. The instruction concerns an actual passage through death.
Christian accounts include Eckhart’s nunc aeternitatis, the eternal now, and Augustine’s treatment of time in Confessions XI. The Buddhist Udāna describes liberation through the unborn and unfabricated. Contemplation opens awareness beyond the succession of arising and passing. Vedanta’s sākṣī names witness consciousness, for which past and future are directly available. Hesychast theoria supplies another contemplative vocabulary. Their descriptions recur around loosened temporal sequence.
Each teaching retains its particular history. Their recurrence discloses a shared territory. Consciousness-primary structure gives the recurrence its operation. Practitioners enter the same field through different cultural preparations. Translation changes the description while the territory remains available.
The Laboratory Evidence
Laboratory programs investigated temporal access through explicit protocols. Their instruments and judgments give each result a bounded carrier. The spiritual operation exceeds any one experimental design.
Remote viewing research began at Stanford Research Institute under Russell Targ and Hal Puthoff. Government work later entered the lineage cataloged under the Stargate Program. Across two decades, institutional investment exceeded twenty million dollars. The operational record includes targets displaced from the viewing moment. A program’s changing names remain distinct from its research lineage.
Ingo Swann’s published account reproduces a Jupiter-viewing transcript dated April 27, 1973. The transcript describes ring-like bands close to the planet. Voyager 1 discovered Jupiter’s ring in early 1979. The case places an earlier field impression beside a later instrumental discovery. Later confirmation supplies a comparison; it does not make the viewing and spacecraft observation the same procedure.
Joe McMoneagle, remote viewer no. 1, describes viewing a submarine under construction at Severodvinsk in 1979. Comparing successive impressions, he estimated readiness for launch four months later, in January. His memoir reports that January 1980 satellite photographs showed the vessel beside a newly cut canal. The account joins remote observations to a forecast and later comparison.
His memoir also describes viewing the locations and treatment of hostages during the Iran crisis. McMoneagle reports that a hostage released for medical reasons recognized the accumulated information’s accuracy. That account concerns remote observations compared after release.
Coordinate Remote Viewing organizes impressions through a structured protocol. Remote-viewing research investigated both contemporaneous and future targets. Russell Targ reports that accuracy remained comparable for targets several days into the future. He describes remote viewing as nonanalytic reception, where describing a shape is easier than guessing a number. Analytical guessing interrupts that reception. Operational accuracy and statistical effect remain different measures.
The 1995 AIR evaluation makes that distinction consequential. Jessica Utts regarded the statistical results as far beyond chance expectations. Their size and consistency made them important scientifically and practically in her assessment. Ray Hyman agreed that selected SAIC effect sizes resisted dismissal as statistical flukes. He distinguished improved SAIC protocols from earlier SRI weaknesses.
Hyman disputed whether all methodological flaws had been excluded and whether independent laboratories produced consistent results. He rejected the conclusion that anomalous cognition had been established. His agreement concerned ten SAIC experiments, not every result in the broader lineage. AIR also assessed intelligence usefulness separately. Its recommendation against continuation cannot turn either reviewer’s position into the other’s conclusion.
Princeton’s Engineering Anomalies Research laboratory worked under Dean Robert G. Jahn for nearly three decades. A benchmark involved operator-influenced random event generators.
Across twelve years, ninety-one practitioners produced nearly 2.5 million trials. The high-versus-low intention comparison gave a reported Z-score of 3.809. Its one-tailed probability under the chance model was 0.0000699. That benchmark remains distinct from the temporal experiments.
In PEAR’s temporal experiments, practitioners directed intention before generator output or after that output had been recorded. Laboratory staff learned their intentions after the data were recorded. PEAR reported comparable effects across remote and off-time conditions. The reported yield showed no dependence on temporal separation within the tested range. The carrier was a shift in random-generator output. The timing of intention supplied the temporal variable.
Consciousness reads the field across the imposed sequence, and the field responds through the registered shift. That operation differs from imagining a person pushing a completed cause backward along a line. The experiment supplies a particular record for the reading. Its result does not identify every carrier through which temporal participation occurs.
Daryl Bem’s 2011 Feeling the Future inverted standard psychological protocols. Subjects studied words after being tested on them. Other subjects responded to images before their selection. Bem reported small statistically significant effects in eight of nine experiments. Perception and reaction time supplied the measured outputs.
The controversy produced failed replications and a meta-analysis of ninety experiments from thirty-three laboratories in fourteen countries. The analysis reported a combined effect size of 0.09 and a Z-score above six. Excluding Bem’s own studies gave the independent replications an estimated effect size of 0.06. The preregistered Transparent Psi Project did not reproduce the above-chance result from Bem’s first experiment. Methods and the existence of the effect remain contested.
An effect size and a percentage above chance have different meanings. The reported standardized quantities must retain their measures. A demonstrated retrocausal effect would change what sequential causation can explain. Disputing the effect’s existence therefore leaves its implications unresolved. Neither a positive aggregate nor a failed replication removes the other from the record.
Time-symmetric physics supplies a separate technical context. Wheeler–Feynman’s absorber theory uses advanced and retarded electromagnetic contributions. Aharonov, Bergmann, and Lebowitz describe quantum measurement using initial and final conditions. Their probability distribution becomes time symmetric when both conditions delimit the sample. These formulations do not all use the same wave mechanism.
John Cramer’s transactional interpretation describes an exchange between advanced and retarded waves. The exchange gives a quantum event its completed transaction. Time symmetry gives these approaches a shared question while their carriers and mathematical constructions differ. A quantum system’s description cannot alone establish a human practitioner’s temporal access.
Wheeler’s delayed-choice experiments were refined through the 1980s and 1990s. A later choice of measurement arrangement changes which account of the quantum system becomes available. The retrocausal interpretation concerns the relation between that choice and the system’s earlier description. It differs from demonstrating alteration of an already recorded classical past. The experiments force attention to measurement and temporal explanation without settling every interpretation.
The Programs
The threshold programs document institutional engagement with trained perception. Wayne McDonnell’s 1983 Analysis and Assessment of Gateway Process supplies a particular Army INSCOM account. He treats ordinary time as a construction of waking consciousness. His assessment joins a tunable bodily system to a holographic substrate.
The proposed coupling runs through a cardiovascular standing wave and the planetary field. The holographic account places information throughout a substrate that ordinary perception distributes across space and time. McDonnell draws on Bohm, Pribram, and Bentov. Their conjunction gives his assessment its structure. The document’s institutional custody does not turn that proposed bodily mechanism into a measured finding.
The released Army copy omits printed page 25 between pages 24 and 26. In 2021, Thobey Campion reported receiving a complete copy from the Monroe Institute. Its recovered page continues McDonnell’s account of spiritual belief systems. The omission establishes neither intentional redaction nor a motive for withholding.
That cosmology describes the Absolute as an infinite uniform energy field outside spacetime. McDonnell links its self-concept with the Christian Holy Spirit. He also connects the universal hologram’s spiral form with the Hebrew Tree of Life and its Hindu counterpart. The correspondence joins spiritual names to a proposed account of the field. It does not make those traditions or their named carriers interchangeable. Temporal access opens onto the larger cosmology through the practitioner’s operation.
The intelligence programs sought to turn temporal access into working information. Their practical demand concerns what a received impression lets an analyst decide. A statistical laboratory result and a tactical report answer different questions. A useful report must support a decision under actual operating conditions.
AIR’s assessment recommended against continuation for intelligence use. That recommendation differs from a determination that all laboratory effects were absent. It also differs from Utts’s conclusion that psychic functioning was established. The program sought a capacity that could supplement conventional collection. Whether particular outputs met its standards remains a question about those records.
Trained temporal access is the capacity behind that institutional ambition. Its time-displaced outputs return information to the present. The laboratory evaluates a bounded performance; intelligence institutions seek command through it. Neither pursuit exhausts what the practitioner can become through the operation.
The Operational Modes
The literature distinguishes several modes of access. Each places different demands on training and judgment. Their names identify how temporal content arrives.
Retrocognition perceives past configurations. Ian Stevenson, Jim Tucker, and the University of Virginia’s Division of Perceptual Studies catalog several thousand children’s past-life cases. Children supply information about deceased people whose lives they had no ordinary channel to know. Those cases give spontaneous access a contemporary record. The child’s usual linear sampling has not yet fully stabilized.
Trained access enters yogic literature through purvajatijñāna, knowledge of former births. Theosophical accounts describe akashic records, the field’s record of past events. The practitioner reads a retained configuration. These traditions assign different training and doctrinal contexts to the operation. Neither requires the remembered life to reside only in the present brain.
Precognition perceives future configurations. PEAR’s temporal data, Bem’s replication corpus, Stargate accounts, and prophetic traditions bear on that mode through different records. A perceived future is probable rather than single. Its realization depends on the present trajectory. Perceiving it can become an input that changes that trajectory.
Jonah gives the problem a concrete form. He announces Nineveh’s destruction; the announcement brings repentance that prevents the destruction. The prediction changes the future it describes. Prophecy therefore carries information about possible configurations without guaranteeing one outcome. The recipient’s response remains part of the event.
Bifurcation perception receives the branching of probable futures as a landscape. The practitioner surveys alternatives instead of following one line. Hopi prophecy, the I Ching, Mayan day-keeping, and traditional astrology approach the future through such differentiated conditions. The Bifurcation catalogs the historical doctrine of a collective turning point. That doctrine remains distinct from every local branching perceived within the field.
Synchronistic perception reads correlations between inner states and outer events. The Jung–Pauli account names their meaningful concurrence without assigning one event as the other’s ordinary cause. A practitioner who stabilizes this mode receives the stream as ongoing communication. Temporal coincidence becomes a relation the practitioner can discriminate.
Five accounts describe guidance through that relation. Nonlocal access receives information beyond ordinary proximity. Retrocausation receives the future self’s influence. Symbiotic intelligence brings a distinct being into the encounter. Substrate responsiveness gives the field’s response; integration joins these operations. Each supplies a partial account of the stream received within one life.
Eternal-now perception dissolves the separation of past and future as tenses. Sequential time becomes recognizable as a condition of consensus experience. Tibetan Clear Light, Zen original face, Sufi baqā billāh, and Christian unitive vision describe that passage through different teachings. Consciousness receives the field without its customary temporal division.
The other modes derive from this underlying availability. A practitioner stabilized there already occupies a configuration in which past and future coexist. Retrocognition and precognition cease to require separate entries. The categories collapse within the operation, while ordinary return still requires judgment. What the practitioner receives must acquire a consequence in the life they continue.
The Device-Narrative
Temporal-anomaly stories often assign access to an engineered device. The human nervous system already supplies the vessel. Practice gives it the coherence required for another mode of perception. The cultural demand for a machine displaces attention from the preparation of that vessel.
Father Pellegrino Ernetti’s chronovisor is a prominent device story. The Benedictine monk and musicologist held the prepoliphony chair at Venice’s Benedetto Marcello Conservatory. Journalist François Brune reports Ernetti’s account of a team of twelve scientists. Ernetti included Enrico Fermi and Wernher von Braun among them. Their alleged device viewed past events.
The story included an alleged photograph of the crucifixion. It was subsequently identified with a wooden carving from the Sanctuary of Merciful Love at Collevalenza. Ernetti maintained the substantive device claim until his death. Brune’s Le Nouveau Mystère du Vatican supplies the principal account. That record offers no physical apparatus through which another investigator can repeat the claimed viewing.
Andrew Basiago describes participation as a child in Project Pegasus, an alleged DARPA time-travel program. His account places it in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Project Looking Glass stories assign future viewing to rotating electromagnetic arrays. Yellow Cube stories assign it to an extraterrestrial device. Self-identified former participants supply the testimony; those accounts do not supply a demonstrated apparatus.
The appetite for these devices has its own consequence. Temporal access moves into the technological imagination after its human discipline becomes unfamiliar. Forgotten temple culture similarly leaves gods displaced into the sky. The machine promises an external possession that replaces transformation of the possessor. Institutional programs and popular stories meet around that desire.
The older traditions concentrated their technical effort on the practitioner. Their question concerns what the vessel must become to receive and govern the encounter. Military Magic follows the institutional ambition to turn prophecy into intelligence and intelligence into command. Command seeks possession of the result. The practitioner must retain judgment over what returns.
The Suppression
The captured consensus excludes temporal access because it breaks linear causation’s exclusive claim. Historiography, law, education, and personal identity rely on the sequence they install. Consciousness reads beyond that sampling and encounters an open future and a past with further available configurations. The field exceeds the history through which institutions give it one settled form.
The prophet or seer receives alternatives that the imposed categories cannot express. An allegedly inevitable trajectory occupies one branch within a wider landscape. Other branches remain available to perception even when they cannot be materially realized in the present configuration. Perception and realization have distinct conditions. The practitioner must carry that distinction into action.
Institutional resistance works through disciplinary boundaries. Physics disputes the interpretation of time-symmetric formulations. Psychology contests the effects and methods within Bem’s corpus. Intelligence institutions classify programs and limit access to their records. Academic treatments often concentrate on the cultural and symbolic aspects of contemplation. Each boundary restricts how the operation can enter common knowledge.
Together, those arrangements supply temporal impedance: resistance to access beyond the admitted sequence. Classification places an assessment under institutional custody and restricts who can examine it. That restriction controls circulation without determining whether every proposed mechanism works. The contest concerns who receives temporal knowledge and whose purposes its use serves.
The responses to Stargate, PEAR, and contemplative practice contest what anomalous access would entail. AIR’s Stargate dispute also concerns methods and independent replication. Hyman’s particular objections cannot be reduced to agreement followed by refusal. Nor can they replace the distinct conclusion Utts reached. The controversy leaves both positions within the record.
Reports recurring across centuries and traditions disclose a temporal territory larger than the institutional sequence. Different preparations give access to recurrent configurations. Practitioners loosen sequential perception and return with another relation to time. That return gives the temporal territory a consequence within the world institutions administer.
The temporal war enters an ordinary next moment. A prediction can capture the recipient within one rehearsed future. Discernment keeps alternatives available and lets the recipient act on what was received. The field impression becomes a choice whose consequence enters the next configuration. The practitioner retains the capacity to read again.
References
Aharonov, Y., Bergmann, P. G., and Lebowitz, J. L. “Time Symmetry in the Quantum Process of Measurement.” Physical Review, 1964.
Bem, Daryl J. “Feeling the Future: Experimental Evidence for Anomalous Retroactive Influences on Cognition and Affect.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2011.
Bem, Daryl, Tressoldi, Patrizio, Rabeyron, Thomas, and Duggan, Michael. “Feeling the Future: A Meta-Analysis of 90 Experiments on the Anomalous Anticipation of Random Future Events.” F1000Research, 2016.
Bentov, Itzhak. Stalking the Wild Pendulum: On the Mechanics of Consciousness. Dutton, 1977.
Bohm, David. Wholeness and the Implicate Order. Routledge, 1980.
Brune, François. Le Nouveau Mystère du Vatican. Albin Michel, 2002.
Corbin, Henry. Cyclical Time and Ismaili Gnosis. Kegan Paul International, 1983.
Corbin, Henry. Mundus Imaginalis, or The Imaginary and the Imaginal. Spring Publications, 1976.
Cramer, John G. “The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.” Reviews of Modern Physics, 1986.
Eliade, Mircea. The Myth of the Eternal Return: Cosmos and History. Princeton University Press, 1949.
Eliade, Mircea. The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion. Harcourt, Brace & World, 1959.
Ibn ʿArabi. al-Futūhāt al-Makkiyya. Partial English translations in William Chittick, The Sufi Path of Knowledge, SUNY Press, 1989.
Jahn, Robert G. and Dunne, Brenda J. Margins of Reality: The Role of Consciousness in the Physical World. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1987.
Jahn, Robert G. and Dunne, Brenda J. “The PEAR Proposition.” Journal of Scientific Exploration, 2005.
Jung, C. G. Synchronicity: An Acausal Connecting Principle. Princeton University Press, 1960.
Kekecs, Z., et al. “Raising the Value of Research Studies in Psychological Science by Increasing the Credibility of Research Reports: The Transparent Psi Project.” Royal Society Open Science, 2023.
McDonnell, Wayne M. Analysis and Assessment of Gateway Process. U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command, 1983.
McMoneagle, Joseph. Mind Trek: Exploring Consciousness, Time, and Space Through Remote Viewing. Hampton Roads, 1993.
McMoneagle, Joseph. Memoirs of a Psychic Spy: The Remarkable Life of U.S. Government Remote Viewer 001. Hampton Roads, 2006.
Monroe, Robert A. Far Journeys. Doubleday, 1985.
Monroe, Robert A. Ultimate Journey. Doubleday, 1994.
Mulla Sadra. al-Asfār al-Arbaʿa. Partial English translation by Latimah Parvin Peerwani, ICAS Press.
Patañjali. Yoga Sutras. Book III on the vibhūti discusses atīta-anāgata-jñāna.
Stevenson, Ian. Twenty Cases Suggestive of Reincarnation. University Press of Virginia, 1966.
Targ, Russell, and Puthoff, Harold. Mind-Reach: Scientists Look at Psychic Ability. Delacorte, 1977.
Tucker, Jim B. Life Before Life: Children’s Memories of Previous Lives. St. Martin’s Press, 2005.
Utts, Jessica. “An Assessment of the Evidence for Psychic Functioning.” Journal of Scientific Exploration, 1996.
Wheeler, John A. and Feynman, Richard P. “Interaction with the Absorber as the Mechanism of Radiation.” Reviews of Modern Physics, 1945.